Talk:Classical conditioning
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Classical conditioning article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
similar pages, combine?
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditioning and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning seem to be the same subject
Yeah, I noticed the same thing.
The Conditioning page is now just disambiguation, and should link to both classical and operant. I think it's fine, currently (10/11/06).
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class psychology articles
- Top-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class Russia articles
- Mid-importance Russia articles
- Mid-importance C-Class Russia articles
- C-Class Russia (science and education) articles
- Science and education in Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles