Talk:Sex position
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sex position article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
Sex position is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured list |
This level-5 vital article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
y
[edit]impreove performance of this page it is so laggy Moho84 (talk) 21:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- I advise you not to jerk off to this page. Geanard (talk) 04:02, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 6 April 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add Category:Sexual intercourse 202.134.11.235 (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 13:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Wording “maximum penetration” is unclear
[edit]What is that supposed to mean? Whatever it does mean, it seems subjective and/or not in an encyclopedic tone Theanswertolifetheuniverseandeverything (talk) 23:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Theanswertolifetheuniverseandeverything: There are wikilinks for penetration within the article. Are you not finding them helpful to address your questions? Wikipedia doesn't shy away from content because it relates to intimate sexual contact, so not sure what your basis is for claiming that the tone is not encyclopedic. Fabrickator (talk) 09:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- Wikipedia former featured lists
- List-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Everyday life
- List-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- List-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- High-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- List-Class Gender studies articles
- Low-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles